IN SEARCH OF THE LADINIAN/CARNIAN BOUNDARY:
 
PERSPECTIVES FROM SPITI (TETHYS HIMALAYA)
 

 
Marco Balini, Leo Krystyn and Valentina Torti


 Fig.1

 
Introduction
 

The Spiti region (Tethys Himalaya) is well known for its Lower and Middle Triassic invertebrate faunal succession which is the most complete within the Tethys and therefore of outstanding biostratigraphic importance for this particular realm.

With the search of a GSSP for the Middle/Upper Triassic (i.e. Ladinian/Carnian) boundary in Northern Italy well in progress (Broglio Loriga et al., 1998), we decided to add the preliminary data obtained during our 1997 joint expedition to the Guling and Muth area of the Pin Valley (Spiti, for location see Krystyn & Orchard, 1996). Our results complement those of Broglio Loriga et al. (1998) as we report also distribution data of conodonts and halobiids, two fossil groups of specific importance for long distance correlations between different biogeographic (i.e. Tethys-North America) and paleoclimatic (i.e. Tethys-Boreal) realms.

According to the recently revised Triassic lithostratigraphy of Spiti (Garzanti et al., 1995) the Ladinian-Carnian boundary interval falls into the Hanse Group (Kaga, Chomule and Grey beds Fm.), in particular between the upper part of the Kaga Fm. and the Chomule Fm. For this interval, however, no new biostratigraphic data have been provided so that at present the only available referring data are those by early authors (Bittner, 1899, Krafft in Hayden, 1904; Diener, 1908 and 1912). These authors used a more traditional lithostratigraphical nomenclature with "Formation" names based on the main occurring fossil groups (Daonella Shales = Kaga Fm.; Daonella and Halobia Lmst. = Chomule Fm.). Dealing primarily with the fossil content we continue to use their now informal names for the greater chance to integrate new and old faunal records. Halobiids and Upper Ladinian ammonoids are reported in the Daonella Shales, while in the overlying Daonella Limestone Krafft (in Hayden, 1904) distinguished a lower portion with Daonella and an upper part with Halobia and the Ladinian-Carnian boundary in between. No ammonoids of stratigraphical significance were reported.
 

Guling section
 

The section was measured 500 m westward from the village of Guling, from the top of the Muschelkalk Member of the Tamba Kurkur Fm to the middle part of the Daonella Limestone (Fig. 1). A second segment covering the upper part of the Daonella Limestone to the Grey beds was not studied in detail. Pelagic bivalves of the genera Daonella and Halobia are common throughout the studied section, while stratigraphically significant ammonoids are restricted to distinct and widely spaced levels. Some conodont samples have also been processed. As the lithology is laterally constant over tens of kilometers, we have integrated into the Guling section some samples from the classical locality of Muth.

The fauna of the Daonella Shales is mostly concentrated in the lenticular or bedded limestone levels that occur in two intervals: 2 to 15 m and 24 to 43 m from the base. The interbedded shales are difficult to sample because of cleavage. In the Daonella Limestone fossils occur in both limestones and marly interbeds. The base of the Daonella Limestone is characterized by a distinct 1-2 m thick stilolithic limestone band ("Traumatocrinus Limestone").
 

Amonoid distribution

The distinct ammonoid bearing horizons allow a quite good timing of the section. The Upper Ladinian age of the top of the Tamba Kurkur Fm. is demonstrated by Protrachyceras archelaus found in its last bed (M47) at Muth. At the base of the second limestone interval of the Daonella Shales a rich ammonoid fauna can be referred to the Meginae Zone on the basis of Meginoceras, Protrachyceras and Anolcites.

The base of "Traumatocrinus Limestone" provided "Celtites" epolensis, Protrachyceras, Rimkinites together with a specimen equivalent to Frankites in ribbing and style of the venter, while the thickness of the whorl is unusually greater. As the specimen is just a body chamber fragment it may belong either to a new genus or to a new species of the genus Frankites. If not condensed, the fauna could represent either the top of the Archelaus Zone s.l. (=Neumayri Zone sensu Mietto & Manfrin, 1995a) or the base of the Regoledanus Zone. A true Frankites (F. cf. regoledanus) has been found in Muth 1 m above the sample 97/179, but could not be extracted from the rock. Further collections are clearly necessary for a definite solution.

The lenticular limestones immediately above the "Traumatocrinus Limestone" yielded at Muth a small sized Muensterites (sample 97/175), while some meters above (sample 97/176) a specimen probably belonging to Daxatina has been found. The specimen shows the typical ventral morphology of Trachyceras, but the definite attribution is not sure because the specimen is a body chamber and misses the suture line.

Above this level some long ranging ammonoids as Sirenotrachyceras, Joannites and Carnites floridus are frequently found, but two levels (VT48 and VT52) provided well preserved and undoubtful Trachyceras of the group of T. aon (here intended as inclusive of T. (Brotheotrachyceras) Urlichs, 1994). A Trachyceras aonoides fauna has been found in the lateral continuation of the outcrop with a position just above the top of the section (sample I5).
 

Pelagic bivalves distribution

At the base of the first limestone interval the Upper Ladinian speies Daonella pichleri occurs in one level (VTS16). Above this level D. indica and D. lommeli are very common. Especially D. lommeli shows a very long range, from the lower part of the Daonella Shales up into the Daonella Limestone. In general D. indica is less frequent than D. lommeli.

From the levels VT36 to VT 46 the bivalves show some modifications with respect to the typical D. lommeli morphology. In VT36 the specimens referred to D. lommeli group, show affinities with D. hagighiolensis, due to the presence of a smooth triangular posterior sector. In the literature (Krystyn & Gruber, 1974) this species is considered as stratigraphically younger than D. lommeli, beeing referred to the Sutherlandi Zone.

The specimens from sample VT46 are very similar to D. lommeli, but show some morphological characters typical of the genus Halobia, as for example the curved pattern of radial costae.

The first true Halobia comes from level VT50, and a few meters above we have found H. zitteli. The latter is a typical form of the Aon Zone and an excellent guide for cross-latitudinal correlations.
 

Conodont distribution

As just few samples have been collected, we cannot provide a complete range chart for the recognized species. Nevertheless, the transition from P. inclinata to Metapolygnathus polygnathiformis is recorded between the Muensterites level and the bed with the questionable Daxatina. Sample 97/175 contains exclusively P. inclinata, while in 97/180 we have found intermediate forms and just 30 cm above (sample D11) the first true representatives of M. polygnathiformis together with P. inclinata. The F.O. of M. polygnathiformis is therefore much lower in the Guling section than the one of Trachyceras gr. aon (respectively at 63 m and 88 m from the base).

The integrated analysis of our data shows that between the Ladinian "Traumatocrinus Limestone" with Frankites and the first Trachyceras gr. aon in the overlying Daonella Limestone there is a 25 m thick rock interval without time-diagnostic fossils in a strict sense. This boundary interval, which may represent the Daxatina cf. canadensis Subzone sensu Mietto & Manfrin, 1995a and a part of the Aon Zone sensu Urlichs, 1994, has to be carefully resampled before final conclusions can be drawn.
 
 

Remarks on the Ladinian/Carnian boundary
 

Due to the scarcity of Ladinian/Carnian fossiliferous sequences in the Tethys the Guling section can be considered a good test for the criteria to define the base of the Carnian Stage. Till now most of the suggestions come from the ammonoids. We have the possibility to test halobiids and conodonts referred to an ammonoid record that is one of the most complete, beeing represented by a succession of up to 5 ammonoid zones across the boundary (Archelaus to Aonoides Zone).

At present two possible solutions can be discussed.

F.O. of Daxatina. This boundary has been proposed by Mietto & Manfrin (1995a and 1995b) because according to their data corresponds to a moment of major changes in ammonoid assemblages (F.A.D. of Daxatina and Clionitites almost coincident with F.A.D. of Trachyceras: Mietto & Manfrin, 1995b, p. 24). The boundary is potentially very useful because Daxatina has a worldwide distribution, but the synchronicity of its F.O. in the different paleobioprovinces has still to be demonstrated and its forerunner is also unknown. Moreover we see other problems. The first problem is, in some respects, formal. Daxatina is not easy to be identified, if the suture line is not visible (i.e., steinkern of body chamber or shelled specimens), so that it does not completely fulfil the requirements of a guide fossil. Recent literature demonstrates that a misinterpretation is possibile, also to experienced specialists. A possible solution could be the choice of the F.O. of Trachyceras that according to Mietto & Manfrin occurs slightly above the F.O. of Daxatina, but once again the worlwide synchronicity of this event has to be demonstrated. In North America for example Trachyceras appears far above Daxatina. As regard the appeareance of Clionitites, in Epidauros section this genus occurs already at the base of the Regoledanus Zone (sample A16 in Krystyn 1983, fig.3 p.244) then Mietto & Manfrin's sections record a F.O., not the F.A.D. of the genus.

In our section the comparison of ammonoid with bivalve distribution lead to conclude that the doubtful Daxatina is not accompanied by any event in the distribution of halobiids. In particular the typical Ladinian guide fossil Daonella lommeli occurs also above. Spiti data in this respect fit well with those from the Western Tethys where the D. lommeli group is also recorded up to Lower Carnian (Krystyn & Gruber, 1974). Finally as regard the conodonts our scarce data do not allow a definite solution. The early appearence of M. polygnatiformis within the Spiti boundary interval may be seen as a possible hint that the species is already present within the Tethyan "Daxatina beds". This unfortunately is not true for North America and the Arctic (Orchard & Tozer, 1998).

Base of the Aon Subzone (sensu Krystyn, 1978). This traditional boundary (see Krystyn, 1978 and Urlichs, 1994 for historical summary) can be drawn at the F.O. of Trachyceras of the T. aon group. Advantage of this solution is the easier identification of the index ammonoid and the better integration with the F.O. of Halobia. The two bioevents are not exactly coeval (F.O. of Halobia is a little younger), but the approximation is very good. In fact Lower Carnian corresponds to a radiation period for halobiids, with the extinction of genus Daonella and the appeareance of genus Halobia. It must also be pointed out that Halobia is climatic independant so that it could play an important role for the correlation of Tethyan and Boreal successions (Krystyn, 1978).
 
 

Conclusions
 

No doubt the sequence described in the San Cassiano area by Broglio Loriga et al. (1998) is good and may have the potential for a GSSP. But its proper designation, in our opinion, seems to be premature for several reasons. The greatest problem is that the section presently lacks comparable data (except for ammonoids) from the overlying (basal) Aon Zone. This hampers seriously a thorough comparison of the pros and cons pointing for the former or the now proposed boundary.

More paleontological work is also needed to demonstrate the suitability of the new boundary as an international standard. The proposed GSSP for example is not sufficiently representative concerning such biostratigraphically significant groups as conodonts and halobiids. A possible paleoenvironmental or paleobiogeographical influence on the distribution of some taxa (i.e., lack of halobiids, "late" appeareance of Clionitites and M. polygnathiformis) should be tested.

Finally with regard to the ammonoids two serious problems have to be solved. At first the Trachyceras and Daxatina species from the Daxatina cf. canadensis Subzone have to be properly described and illustrated. The Trachyceras species in the Daxatina cf. canadensis Subzone could be a good reason for the new boundary, but at present the features of these species are unknown and the taxonomy does not seem to be stable: the only Trachyceras from the Subzone (Trachyceras muensteri: Mietto & Manfrin, 1995a, pl. 5, fig. 5; 1995b, pl. 2, fig. 16) is from debris, moreover it has been recently renamed as Daxatina cf. canadensis (Broglio Loriga et al., 1998, pl. 2, fig. 16).

Secondly, based on a careful study of both the type material as well as the figures in Mietto & Manfrin (1995b) and unpublished material from Epidauros we see no chance for a morphologic (and taxonomic) separation of Frankites regoledanus and Frankites apertus as done by the mentioned authors. When adopting the new zonation this will lead to serious confusion in the future stratigraphic scale.
 

Acknowledgements
 

Field work has been supported by CNR grant to Prof. M. Gaetani (MB & VT) and by "Austrian National Committee for IGCP" - IGCP 359 (LK). Daniela Germani (Milano) helped during field sampling.
 

References
 

Bittner, A., 1899. Trias Brachiopoda und Lamellibranchiata. Palaeont. Indica, ser. 15, Himalayan Fossils, 3/2: 1-76.
Broglio Loriga, C., Cirilli, S., De Zanche, V., Di Bari, D., Gianolla, P., Laghi, G.F., Lowrie, W., Manfrin, S., Mastrandrea, A., Mietto, P., Muttoni, G., Neri, C., Posenato,
    R., Rechichi, M.C., Rettori, R. and Roghi, G., 1998. The Prati di Stuores/Stuores Wiesen section (Dolomites, Italy): as GSSP candidate for the Ladinian-Carnian
    boundary. Meeting 2-3 July 1998: 1-30.
Diener, C. 1908. Ladinic, Carnic and Noric faunae of Spiti. Palaeont. Indica, Ser. 15, 5/3, 1-157.
Diener, C. 1912. The Trias of the Himalayas. Mem. Geol. Surv. of India, 36: 1-159.
Garzanti, E., Jadoul, F., Nicora, A. and Berra, F., 1995. Triassic of Spiti (Tethys Himalaya, N India). Riv. It. Paleont. Strat., 101/3: 267-300.
Hayden, H.H., 1904. The geology of Spiti, with parts of Bashar and Rupshu. Mem. Geol. Surv. of India, 36: 1-129.
Krystyn, L., 1978. Eine neue Zonengliederung im alpin mediterranen Unterkarn. In H. Zapfe (Ed.): Beiträge zur Biostratigraphie der Tethys-Trias. Schr. Erdwiss. Komm.
    Österr. Akad. Wiss., 4: 37-75.
Krystyn, L., 1983. Das Epidauros-Profil (Griechenland) - ein Beitrag zur Conodonten-Standardzonierung des tethyalen Ladin und Unterkarn. Schr. Erdwiss. Komm., Österr.
    Akad. Wiss, 5, Zapfe H. ed.: Das Forschungsproject "Triassic on Tethys Realm" (IGCP Project 4): 231-258.
Krystyn, L. and Gruber, B., 1974. Daonella lommeli (Wissmann) im Hallstätter Kalk der Nördlichen Kalkalpen (Österreich). N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Mh., 5: 279-286.
Krystyn, L. and Orchard, M.J., 1996. Lowermost Triassic ammonoid and conodont biostratigraphy of Spiti, India. Albertiana, 17: 10-21.
Mietto, P. and Manfrin, S., 1995a. A high resolution Middle Triassic ammonoid standard scale in the Tethys Realm. A preliminary report. Bull. Soc. Geol. France, 166/5:
    539-563.
Mietto, P. and Manfrin, S., 1995b. La successione delle faune ad ammonoidi al limite Ladinico-Carnico (Sudalpino, Italia). Ann. Univ. Ferrara, Sci. Terra, 5: 13-35.
Orchard, M.J. and Tozer, E.T., 1998. Triassic conodont biochronology and intercalibration with the canadian ammonoid sequence. Albertiana, 20: 33-44.
Urlichs, M., 1994. Trachyceras Laube 1869 (Ammonoidea) aus dem Unterkarn (Obertrias) der Dolomiten (Italien). Stutt. Beitr. Naturkunde, ser. B, 217: 1-55.


 © ALBERTIANA, September 1998